NEWS
>  Homepage>  NEWS

BIX-F22 Pelvic Measurement Model: Intra vs Extrapelvic Measurement, Taught Properly

Date:2026-11-11  |  Author:ADA MED SUPPLY LIMITED

BIX-F22 Pelvic Measurement Model: Intra vs Extrapelvic Measurement, Taught Properly

Clinical pelvimetry is taught badly when students measure the outside of the pelvis and believe they have measured the birth canal, so a model that lets an instructor reveal the inside is worth more than one that only looks realistic. BIX-F22 is an adult female model with flexible joints throughout, described by the supplier as having clear anatomical landmarks for positioning, a transparent window in the lower abdomen so the intrapelvic measurement can be observed from outside, and support for both intrapelvic and extrapelvic measurement. This comparison explains the difference between the two sets of measurements, how to teach each on the model, and what the evidence allows you to claim.

ItemDetail
ModelBIX-F22
TypePelvic measurement model, adult female
JointsFlexible throughout, to allow different positions
LandmarksDescribed as obvious for manipulation and positioning
Key featureTransparent lower-abdominal window to observe the intrapelvic measurement
MeasurementsIntrapelvic and extrapelvic
Main useMidwifery and obstetric skills teaching, clinical pelvimetry drills
PriceQuoted per order
CertificationISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 (as listed)

Extrapelvic measurements: what they can and cannot tell you

The four external diameters. Intercristal, interspinous, intertrochanteric and the external conjugate are the standard external measurements. They describe the bony envelope, and they are quick to teach and quick to examine.

They do not measure the inlet. This is the misconception the model should break: an external conjugate of normal length does not exclude a narrow obstetric conjugate, because the measurement passes around the sacrum rather than through the pelvis. Students who learn this on a model with a transparent window remember it.

Landmarks are the examinable part. The supplier describes the landmarks as obvious for manipulation. Use that: ask the student to find the iliac crests, the anterior superior iliac spines, the pubic tubercles and the sacral promontory by palpation before any caliper or tape appears.

Intrapelvic measurement: the part that transfers

  1. Diagonal conjugate. Vaginal examination to the sacral promontory. On the model, the transparent window lets the instructor watch where the examining fingers actually go, which is impossible on a patient during a first attempt.
  2. Obstetric conjugate. Calculated by subtracting 1.5 to 2 cm from the diagonal conjugate. The model is the right place to show why the subtraction exists, because the class can see the pubic symphysis and the promontory at the same time.
  3. Transverse diameter of the inlet and the interspinous diameter. Bimanual assessment of the narrowest part of the cavity. This is the measurement most often skipped in practice and the one most associated with arrest of descent.
  4. Sacral curve and pubic arch. Assessed by hand, not by number. The model allows the student to trace the curve and describe it in words, which is what a record should contain.

How the model changes a session

Observation before correction. In a normal classroom, an instructor cannot see what a student's fingers are doing inside a manikin. The transparent window turns an invisible skill into a visible one, which shortens the feedback loop dramatically.

Position changes are teachable. Flexible joints allow the lithotomy and lateral positions to be set, so students practise the examination in the positions used in labour rather than in one fixed pose.

It supports the honest answer about evidence. Routine X-ray or CT pelvimetry is not recommended for deciding mode of delivery in cephalic presentations at term, because the evidence does not show benefit [1]. What remains valuable is the clinical assessment skill — recognising a contracted inlet or a prominent ischial spine — and that skill is what the model trains. WHO intrapartum care guidance frames assessment around the progress of labour and the individual woman rather than around a set of bony diameters [2], and later work on intrapartum care measures keeps the focus on processes that change outcomes [3].

Buying comparison: what to check against other pelvic models

CriterionWhy it matters
Transparent windowWithout it, intrapelvic technique cannot be observed or corrected
Joint mobilityFixed models cannot teach position-dependent examination
Fetal head inclusionMeasurement teaching is stronger when the fetal head can be related to the diameters
Landmark clarityPalpation practice depends on being able to find crests and spines reliably
Spare partsPelvic models are handled heavily; confirm replacement availability

If a competing model lacks the window or the joints, it is a demonstration pelvis rather than a measurement trainer, and the price difference should be judged on that basis.

Buying notes

  1. Ask whether a fetal head is included. It is not listed for BIX-F22; if your course teaches station and engagement, request it as an accessory.
  2. Confirm the window material. Ask how the transparent panel is cleaned and whether it scratches.
  3. Plan one model per four to five students. Vaginal examination technique cannot be taught to a queue.
  4. Request a measurement worksheet matching the diameters your curriculum examines.
  5. Check the stand height. Examination technique depends on the model being at bed height for the student.

Documentation and quotation. Specification, accessory list and current pricing for BIX-F22 are available from adanursing@adaanatomy.com.

FAQ

Q1. What does BIX-F22 allow students to practise? Intrapelvic and extrapelvic pelvic measurement on an adult female model with flexible joints and a transparent lower-abdominal window.

Q2. Why does the transparent window matter? It lets the instructor see where the examining fingers are during intrapelvic measurement, so technique can be corrected rather than assumed.

Q3. Does it include a fetal head? A fetal head is not listed in the product description; ask the supplier whether it can be supplied as an accessory.

Q4. Is clinical pelvimetry still recommended? Routine X-ray or CT pelvimetry is not supported for deciding mode of delivery at term; clinical assessment of pelvic shape and landmarks remains a taught skill.

Q5. What positions can the model be placed in? The joints are flexible throughout, so the model can be set in the positions used for examination during labour.

Q6. What is the price and minimum order? Quoted per order, depending on quantity and destination.

References

  1. Pattinson RC, Cuthbert A, Vannevel V. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term for deciding on mode of delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD000161. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000161.pub2
  2. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  3. Vallely LM, Shalit A, Nguyen R, et al. Intrapartum care measures and indicators for monitoring the implementation of WHO recommendations for a positive childbirth experience. BMJ Open. 2023;13(11):e069081. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069081

For a quotation on BIX-F22, including any fetal-head accessory and a measurement worksheet, write to adanursing@adaanatomy.com with your programme level and class size.

Email: adanursing@adaanatomy.com
Phone: +86 13383897707
Tel: +86-0379-65160607
Marketing Center: Hong Kong, China
Production Base: Shanghai, China
Phone: +86 13383897707